<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HuffPo Article About Legal Research Gets it Wrong: Everything Old is New Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/</link>
	<description>All about the practice of legal research and writing, and how to start and run a successful legal research and writing practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:50:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Crack Corn</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Crack Corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/?p=631#comment-101138</guid>
		<description>I apologize. You noted three features, not four. My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize. You noted three features, not four. My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Crack Corn</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Crack Corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/?p=631#comment-101137</guid>
		<description>Did you have something constructive to say or is going after Mr. Schwartz supposed to prove a point?

Your opinions aside, you are correct in at least one area, this is in fact a rant. 

Briefly reviewing a web site for points to support your argument is not research. Have you used Mr. Schwartz&#039;s product before? Surely there are more than just four features, or are those just the ones that would supported your claims?

Let us know when you have something constructive to contribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you have something constructive to say or is going after Mr. Schwartz supposed to prove a point?</p>
<p>Your opinions aside, you are correct in at least one area, this is in fact a rant. </p>
<p>Briefly reviewing a web site for points to support your argument is not research. Have you used Mr. Schwartz&#8217;s product before? Surely there are more than just four features, or are those just the ones that would supported your claims?</p>
<p>Let us know when you have something constructive to contribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
