<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HuffPo Article About Legal Research Gets it Wrong: Everything Old is New Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/</link>
	<description>All about the practice of legal research and writing, and how to start and run a successful legal research and writing practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Schwartz: Zed&#8217;s Dead &#8211; Law, Finance, and the Future of Online Publishing (Part One) &#124; SaviourFavor.com</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101441</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Schwartz: Zed&#8217;s Dead &#8211; Law, Finance, and the Future of Online Publishing (Part One) &#124; SaviourFavor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/?p=631#comment-101441</guid>
		<description>[...] print subscription cancellations. Lisa Solomon of the Legal Research  &amp; Writing Pro blog simply  wrote that I was &quot;dead wrong&quot;, although her argument didn&#8217;t extend beyond  &quot;like it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] print subscription cancellations. Lisa Solomon of the Legal Research  &amp; Writing Pro blog simply  wrote that I was &quot;dead wrong&quot;, although her argument didn&#8217;t extend beyond  &quot;like it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed&#8217;s Dead &#8211; Law, Finance, and the Future of Online Publishing (Part One) &#171; All Hat, No Cattle</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101433</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed&#8217;s Dead &#8211; Law, Finance, and the Future of Online Publishing (Part One) &#171; All Hat, No Cattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/?p=631#comment-101433</guid>
		<description>[...] print subscription cancellations. Lisa Solomon of the Legal Research &amp; Writing Pro blog simply  wrote that I was &#8220;dead wrong&#8221;, although her argument didn&#8217;t extend beyond &#8220;like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] print subscription cancellations. Lisa Solomon of the Legal Research &amp; Writing Pro blog simply  wrote that I was &#8220;dead wrong&#8221;, although her argument didn&#8217;t extend beyond &#8220;like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed&#8217;s Dead &#8211; Law, Finance, and the Future of Online Publishing &#124; LaTimesDaily.com</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101432</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed&#8217;s Dead &#8211; Law, Finance, and the Future of Online Publishing &#124; LaTimesDaily.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/?p=631#comment-101432</guid>
		<description>[...] print subscription cancellations. Lisa Solomon of the Legal Research  &amp; Writing Pro blog simply  wrote that I was &quot;dead wrong&quot;, although her argument didn&#8217;t extend beyond  &quot;like it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] print subscription cancellations. Lisa Solomon of the Legal Research  &amp; Writing Pro blog simply  wrote that I was &quot;dead wrong&quot;, although her argument didn&#8217;t extend beyond  &quot;like it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed&#8217;s Dead &#8211; Law, Finance, and the Future of Online Publishing (Part One) &#124; LaTimesDaily.com</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101431</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed&#8217;s Dead &#8211; Law, Finance, and the Future of Online Publishing (Part One) &#124; LaTimesDaily.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/?p=631#comment-101431</guid>
		<description>[...] print subscription cancellations. Lisa Solomon of the Legal Research  &amp; Writing Pro blog simply  wrote that I was &quot;dead wrong&quot;, although her argument didn&#8217;t extend beyond  &quot;like it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] print subscription cancellations. Lisa Solomon of the Legal Research  &amp; Writing Pro blog simply  wrote that I was &quot;dead wrong&quot;, although her argument didn&#8217;t extend beyond  &quot;like it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Crack Corn</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Crack Corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/?p=631#comment-101138</guid>
		<description>I apologize. You noted three features, not four. My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize. You noted three features, not four. My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Crack Corn</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/blog/2009/08/13/huffpo-article-about-legal-research-gets-it-wrong-everything-old-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-101137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Crack Corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchandwritingpro.com/?p=631#comment-101137</guid>
		<description>Did you have something constructive to say or is going after Mr. Schwartz supposed to prove a point?

Your opinions aside, you are correct in at least one area, this is in fact a rant. 

Briefly reviewing a web site for points to support your argument is not research. Have you used Mr. Schwartz&#039;s product before? Surely there are more than just four features, or are those just the ones that would supported your claims?

Let us know when you have something constructive to contribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you have something constructive to say or is going after Mr. Schwartz supposed to prove a point?</p>
<p>Your opinions aside, you are correct in at least one area, this is in fact a rant. </p>
<p>Briefly reviewing a web site for points to support your argument is not research. Have you used Mr. Schwartz&#8217;s product before? Surely there are more than just four features, or are those just the ones that would supported your claims?</p>
<p>Let us know when you have something constructive to contribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

